"The Defeat of Darius (339-330 BC) by Alexander the Great (356-323 BC), 331 BC"
Oil on canvas by Francois Louis Joseph Watteau (1758-1823)
(Illustration courtesy of www.wikigallery.org )
Today in Military History: October 1, 331 BCOil on canvas by Francois Louis Joseph Watteau (1758-1823)
(Illustration courtesy of www.wikigallery.org )
For today's military history post, I present a battle involving the undefeated Macedonian ruler who helped spread Greek culture throughout the Middle East to Egypt to India. This clash of armies in the fourth century BC was his masterpiece (in my humble opinion), and guaranteed the collapse of the Achaemenid Persian Empire.
Background
The Persian Empire at this time was ruled by Darius III. Having ruled the Persian Empire since 336, Darius was 49 years old, and is described by many ancient historians as a weak, indecisive ruler with a seeming lack of ambition. He inherited a kingdom with rebellious satraps (governors), and a large number of disaffected people.
When Alexander and his Greco-Macedonian allied army invaded Asia Minor (modern-day Turkey) in 334, Darius did not regard the invaders as a significant threat. He put his trust in the local governors to stop this threat from across the Aegean Sea, staying in his capital of Persepolis. Unfortunately, Alexander won the first battle of his Asian expedition at the Granicus River. [For more information on this battle, please visit my earlier Burn Pit posts: Battle of Granicus and Battle of Granicus Part II .]
In November of 333, Darius gathered an army and nearly cut off the supply line of Alexander's forces, before losing the battle of Issus. Though greatly outnumbered, the boy-king of Macedon inflicted a severe defeat on the Persians; Alexander even came close to personally killing King Darius himself, but the Persian king fled the battlefield to continue the resistance to the invaders.
Reconstruction of mosaic found in ruins of city of Pompeii (now on display at the National Archaeological Museum, Naples, Italy); it depicts Alexander (bare-headed rider on left) pursuing King Darius of Persia (in chariot right of center) in the latter stages of the battle of Issus (333 BC)
Prelude to the Battle
Bust of Alexander the Great, ca. 2nd – 1st century BC
On display in the British Museum, London, UK
As the Macedonians approached the site of the coming conflict, a Persian messenger was brought to Alexander. The herald brought an offer of peace from Darius. The Achaemenid monarch offered to give Alexander half of the Persian Empire, 10,000 talents of gold (1 talent was enough to equip and pay the crew of a Greek warship for a year), and the hand of one his daughters; all this Darius offered to Aleaxander if he would cease his invasion and return home. Alexander rejected the offer out-of-hand; he *already* owned half the Persian Empire, and wanted to acquire the remaining half, he had no interest in money; and, since he had already conquered half his empire, Darius would have no choice but to marry off his daughter. The general Parmenion, who had served Alexander's father Philip – said, "If I were Alexander, I would accept." Alexander smoothly replied, "So would I, if I were Parmenion."
Map of Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq) showing site of battle
On the night before the battle, Parmenion and some of the other Macedonian officers urged Alexander to make a surprise night attack on the Persian camp. But the Macedonian ruler rejected the advice. In addition to the obvious difficulty of maintaining the coherence of his forces at night, Alexander gave Parmenion a more personal reason for rejecting such stealthy action: "I will not demean myself by stealing victory like a thief. Alexander must defeat his enemies openly and honestly." [Unknown to Alexander, Darius had expected such a move, and ordered his entire army to stand ready all night long. As a result, the next morning the Macedonians were well-rested, and the Persians were fatigued from lack of sleep.]
The Persian Dispositions
Alexander's army marched straight for the Persian encampment. The Persians had found a large, flat plain partially ringed by hills, with no major water course of any sort. Darius had assembled an army from all the remaining satrapies (provinces) of his empire. Some of the early historians claimed the Achaemenid force numbered up to 1 million men; that figure is surely an exaggeration. However, a more likely number is 200,000 soldiers.
Darius's army was drawn up in two long lines. The second line consisted of tens of thousands of recently levied infantrymen. These were men mainly armed with spears, short swords, and light armor (if any) and wicker shields. These soldiers were not considered to be vital to the success of Darius's battle plan, so they were likely being used as the base around which the Persian cavalry would rally. If we accept the 200,000 figure from above, then the line of Persian infantry numbered between 125,000 and 150,000 men.
The Persian front line consisted almost completely of cavalry. These squadrons of horsemen included Bactrians, Persians, Parthians, Susians, Scythians and even Indians from the western side of the Indus River. The only exceptions were some 2000 Greek mercenary hoplites in the Persian force; these men were divided in half and stationed in the front line to provide a steadying influence on the hinges of the Persian right and left wings with the center. In addition, somewhere in the center of the front line were the infamous "Immortals," 10,000 infantrymen who were considered the finest troops in the Persian army.
Achaemenid Persian Immortals, re-enactors for 2500th anniversary
Of the founding of the Persian Empire (1971)
Alexander had made good use of his time the day before the battle, studying the Persian army as it stood arrayed for battle as it awaited the Macedonian attack which didn't come. The king and his generals developed a set of tactics which gave his outnumbered army a good chance for victory.
Alexander deployed his spear-armed infantry in the center of his line, the phalanx, deployed in six units. These men were usually the main arm of attack of his force, but they would serve a different purpose this day. Their main weapon was the 18-21 foot-long sarissa, a spear that kept their enemy at bay. Immediately to the right of these men were the hypaspists, footmen armed similar to the classic hoplites; these soldiers were usually assigned the job of guarding the flank of the unit to their left. That unit was Alexander's personal cavalry guardsmen, the Companions. These heavily armored horsemen were often used against enemy cavalry, and could easily break an entire army. In front of the Companions were peltasts, Greek archers and javelineers, whose main job was to disrupt enemy formations.
A second line of pike-armed men, formed in a phalanx, was posted to the rear of the Macedonian main line. It was given two major tasks: to guard the Macedonian camp, which was a couple of miles to the rear; and, to act as reinforcements for the main battle line if needed.
Macedonian phalanx, 4th century BC
(Illustration courtesy of Wikipedia, & the Dept. of Military History, U.S. Military Academy)
On the left wing – commanded by Parmenion, his most trusted officer – the Macedonians deployed two units of cavalry, another unit of Greek hoplites, and other band of peltasts to their front. The far left wing had several units of Thessalian horsemen. These men, mirroring the right flank guard, were deployed at an angle to the main Macedonian line to prevent an outflanking maneuver. According to the Roman historian Arrian – writing in the 2nd century AD – when Alexander's entire army was deployed for battle, it was no wider than the Persian center.
Part II – Battle of Gaugamela
October 1st, 2012 by Siggurdsson
"Charge of the Persian Scythe Chariots at the Battle of Gaugamela" by Andre Castaigne (1898?)
(Unless otherwise indicated, all illustrations are courtesy of Wikipedia)
Today in Military History: October 1, 331 BC(Unless otherwise indicated, all illustrations are courtesy of Wikipedia)
After staying up into the wee hours of the night making his plans for the battle, Alexander over-slept until sometime after dawn, but awoke rested and ready for his long, strenuous day. Not long after he arose, the Macedonian monarch addressed his troops and began the initial attack.
Macedonian Companion cavalryman, 4th century BC
(Illustration courtesy of http://warandgame.com)
The usual Macedonian tactic called for the entire line of the phalanx to move forward to engage the enemy. However, Alexander and his officers did not do this; instead, Alexander took his Companions, the Hypaspists, the peltasts, and his right flank guard units, and began a slow – almost leisurely – march to his right, at about a 30-degree angle from his front line. In the meantime, the remainder of his army under the command of Parmenion began its own slow advance, following behind Alexander's contingent.
Battle of Gaugamela, 331 BC; First Macedonian Movement
(Illustrations courtesy of www.allempires.com)
At the same time, Darius ordered most of his right flank horsemen to attempt to outflank the Macedonian army on its left flank, assault the main phalanx in its rear, and then attack the Macedonian camp. [In addition to the loot which the camp contained, Darius had a more personal reason for attacking Alexander's base camp. His mother Sisygambis and other members of his immediate family had been captured by Alexander 2 years earlier after the battle of Issus, and Darius hoped to "rescue" them. Alexander had treated them well, and the Queen Mother regarded the Macedonian monarch as her own son.]
Battle of Gaugamela; Persian initial attacks by cavalry and scythed chariots
The remaining chariots approached the Macedonian line, fully expecting to impact it and cause horrifying damage and slaughter. Unfortunately for them, their enemy was one step ahead of them. As the Persian chariots came bearing down on the massed pikemen, the first few ranks of soldiers stepped to either side of the chariots, opening up a wide gap in their lines. Then, the back ranks brandished their long pikes, stopping the horses' charge. Finally, the Macedonian ranks closed, and the crews and horses were dispatched quickly. [Most of the chronicles of the battle do not say how the Persian elephants were handled, except that they were apparently all captured by the Macedonians at the battle's end.]
By this point in the fighting, the Persian right and left flank cavalry were fully engaged with the Macedonian left and right flanks. In the process, the Persian left flank cavalry had left a gap between themselves and the Persian center. Upon seeing this gap, Alexander ordered his Hypaspists and four battalions of his main phalanx to advance and attack the Persian center – which included King Darius and his bodyguards, as well as the two mercenary Greek hoplite units. At this point, Alexander made his main plan known: with his phalangists fully engaged and holding the Persians in place (the "anvil"), Alexander launched his Companion cavalry at the flank of the Persian center, after forming his horsemen into a colossal wedge (the "hammer") Trailing behind his charging cavalrymen were two units of missile troops, who would prove their worth in the coming fight.
Battle of Gaugamela; Alexander's "hammer" strikes, Persians attack Macedonian camp
Macedonian Companions in wedge formation
(Alexander is the tip of the wedge)
As Alexander's Companions continued to brush aside the various units of the Persian center – with Darius's bodyguard as its final goal – one unit of Persian infantry saw a chance to win some glory. They moved forward to attack the rear of the rampaging Companions. Fortunately, a unit of Agrianian peltasts moved up and intercepted the Persian infantry, preserving the integrity of the Macedonian "hammer." At about the same time – far to the rear of this great battle – as the Persians milled about the Macedonian camp, they were attacked by the reserve phalanx, and either put to flight or killed to a man.
Battle of Gaugamela; Companions roll up the Persian center, Darius flees
Detail from ivory carving of Darius fleeing the battle of Gaugamela
Based on a painting by Charles le Brun (1619-1690); carving's author unknown
Currently on display at the National Archaeological Museum of Spain, Madrid
Battle of Gaugamela; Alexander's Companions mop-up Persian left and right flanks
Aftermath
As with most battles of antiquity, casualty figures are poor guesses at best. Alexander's army suffered the following losses:
- 100 infantry and 1000 cavalry killed or wounded (according to Arrian)
- 300 Infantry killed or wounded (according to Curtius Rufus, 1st century AD Roman historian)
- 500 infantry (according Diodorus Siculus, 1st century BC Greek historian)
Persian casualties were equally inflated. Arrian claimed that over 300,000 Persians were killed "and far more were taken prisoners than were killed." Somewhat more reasonable numbers came from Curtius Rufus – claiming 40,000 casualties – and from Diodorus – citing 90,000 total casualties.
Footnote #1: Darius fled eastward towards Media, guessing correctly that Alexander would march southward toward Babylon. Darius addressed his remaining soldiers, saying he intended to form another army to contest Alexander's march. However, several of his "loyal" satraps finally had enough. Nine months later, conspirators led by his cousin Bessus took Darius, putting him in chains to temporarily keep him alive. As Alexander's mobile pursuit force approached the Persian forces, Darius was mortally wounded and his body left by the roadside. Some Greek soldiers found the former King of Kings still alive, informing Alexander of his dying condition. Unfortunately, the king arrived just as Darius expired. Alexander felt great sorrow for Darius, feeling that this was a shabby way to treat an honorable enemy. The Macedonian commander ordered Darius's body to be properly prepared and buried in the former Persian imperial capital of Persepolis.
"Alexander Covers the Body of Darius with His Cloak"
Engraving by Bernhard Rode (c. 1769)
Footnote #3: Eight years after Gaugamela, upon learning of the death of Alexander, Persian Queen Mother Sisygambis had herself sealed into her rooms and died of grief and starvation. There is also an asteriod – 823 Sisigambis – named for her.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου