Massacre
at Fort Mims in 1813. From History of the War for the Union : civil,
military & naval. (New York : Johnson, Fry, 1861-1865) Duyckinck,
Evert A. (Evert Augustus) (1816-1878), Author. Chappel, Alonzo
(1828-1887), Illustrator
Many
war leaders are defined by a single incident, one that exhibits their
skills, character, and even limitations. For Red Eagle, the Creek Indian
war chief and leader in the Creek War, this moment came with the attack
on Fort Mims on the 30th of August, 1813.
Lying in Wait
Red
Eagle was a cunning and patient warrior. With a force reputedly as
large as a thousand warriors, he crept up on the isolated Fort Mims,
surrounding it without the inhabitants noticing. Deftly and silently,
his troops slid through the surrounding woods, tightening the noose on
the men and woman inside.
All of this might have come to nothing
if not for the fort’s commander, Major Beasley. Beasley remained unfazed
by warnings of an imminent native attack. He sent troops out to
investigate one of these reports, but no threat was found, and so
Beasley punished the men who had brought what he considered a false
warning.
Inside
the fort, Beasley’s men relaxed, singing and playing games. Outside the
walls, Red Eagle held back his eager men. They had no artillery with
which to break open the defences. If they were to get inside, then they
would need to seize the gate while it was open, and that would require
perfect timing.
Reconstructed Fort Mims, looking West. Wikipedia Commons / Public Domain
The Perfect Time to Attack
Their
moment came at noon. The drum for dinner sounded, drawing men away from
the gate. Those who remained were lethargic, focused more on their
stomachs than on the task at hand.
Keeping his men quiet, Red
Eagle led them in a charge on the gate. The men on duty there did not
see them until they were thirty feet away. They called out the alarm and
rushed to close the gate, but it was too late. The natives overwhelmed
them and poured through the gateway, into the grounds of Fort Mims.
Holding the Second Line
Fortunately
for Beasley and his men, work had begun on a second line within the
outer defences. Though incomplete, this gave them a point to fall back
to.
Beasley might not have been a wise commander, but he was a
brave one. Rushing to the American line, he joined in the defence of his
fort. Among the first defenders to face Red Eagle’s men, he was badly
wounded in the fighting, but refused offers of support, or to withdraw
to a safe place. He died there on the line, fending off the attack he
had been sure was not coming.
The fighting was brutal. Neither
side expected mercy from the other. The attackers had superior numbers,
but their opponents had defensive positions. Everybody in the fort,
soldier or civilian, grabbed a weapon and rushed to the fight. A melee
with knives, tomahawks, and the improvised clubs of rifle butts ensued.
Among
the attackers were several Creek Indian prophets, men who had helped to
stir up war and who claimed to be invincible in battle. This part of
their prophecies proved false, as they were cut down by gunfire. While
this shook the faith of some of the natives, Red Eagle was not a true
believer. He held his courage and kept up the assault.
The surrender of Red Eagle at the end of the Red Stick War. Wikipedia / Public Domain
Dividing the Defenders
Red
Eagle was losing many men in his attempt to push past the second line
of defences. He needed another way to weaken the defenders.
Dividing
his forces, he sent some around the outside of the fort to attack it
from different sides. This forced the enemy to divide their numbers to
fight off these attacks. Already outnumbered, they were now thinly
spread and so more vulnerable to attack. The main assault faced less
resistance.
The man who came closest to breaking this strategy was
Captain Dixon Bailey. Like Red Eagle, he was a man of mixed blood, but
he had chosen the American side in the war. Knowing that native
attackers often spent all their energy in the initial assault, he urged
his troops to persevere, as things would get better. When it became
apparent that Red Eagle’s leadership was keeping the attackers in the
fray, Bailey tried to march his men out and fight their way to safety at
another fort. But the overwhelming native forces held them in.
Fort Mims Massacre – Wikipedia / Public Domain
Falling Back in Flames
Two
of Bailey’s brothers, James and Daniel, turned a house inside the fort
into a defensive position, making firing holes in the roof. In response,
the natives shot burning arrows into the building, setting it on fire.
Bit
by bit, the defenders were forced back across the fort. Building by
building, the fire spread, further limiting their options. Women and
children did not dare to leave the burning buildings for fear of being
massacred. As the last of the defenders were driven back into a single
enclosure, most of their officers dead and their home turning into a
charred ruin, it became clear that the attackers had won.
Alabama Historical Association Fort Mims marker. Wikipedia / Public Domain
Savagery and Sorrow
The
brutality of the fighting continued past the point at which all had
been decided. Settlers and soldiers alike were massacred by natives,
their blood boiling over at the white men’s attempts to take their lands
from them. With the heat of battle upon them, few were willing to show
calm and mercy.
Red Eagle was among those without a taste for
butchery, but he could not control his men. A half-blood of mixed Creek
and Scottish ancestry, he had argued for peace in the build-up to the
war. Though he had brought them victory, the more hot-headed warriors
were not inclined to listen when he called on them to stop.
This
was Red Eagle. A cunning and patient tactician. A man of determination
but also of mercy. One with enough influence to lead the tribes into
war, but not to call them back from it.
The massacre at Fort Mims
marked the first great success for Red Eagle in the Creek War, but
ultimately it would contribute to his downfall. Enraged at the massacre,
the whites flung themselves forcefully into stopping what they saw as a
fundamental threat.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου